|
|
 |
> Home > ***WNMD ONLY*** > News + Media2 > News Releases 2004 > APR 1504 PEOPLE IN POLITICS POST EVENT
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE:
KEY CALIFORNIA AND NEW YORK POLTICAL INFLUENCERS TACKLE
ISSUES CREATED BY DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSFORMATION OF URBAN
AMERICA
Center for The Study of Los Angeles at LMU Hosts Conference
Identifying Key Lessons Drawn From The Recent Political Histories
Of Los Angeles, New York, And Other Large Cities
April 15, 2004 - Key California and
New York political influencers gathered at Loyola Marymount
University in Los Angeles today to discuss the findings of a report
produced by the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy on "People
and Politics in America's Big Cities."
The results of the study, presented at the beginning of the "People
and Politics in Los Angeles" conference hosted by LMU's Center for
the Study of Los Angeles, indicated an unprecedented emerging
demographic transformation in both New York City and Los Angeles.
The report, which found that immigration is helping to produce a
new racial and ethnic composition in metropolitan America, also
analyzed the 2001 mayoral and city council elections in both urban
cities, highlighting the troubling gaps in representation between
the populations and elected officials. The results of the study
sparked discussions about next steps on several different panels
throughout the day.
Exploring how to create coalitions in a multi-cultural city, a
panel including California Senator Richard Alarc�n, Calif.
State Assembly Speaker Emeritus Robert Hertzberg, publisher and
President of La Opinion Monica Lozano, and former LA city council
member Michael Woo tackled some tough issues including
communication, transportation, and racial politics.
Said Woo, "With 80 separate municipalities, Los Angeles is not very
effective in dealing with regional issues. As one example - the
future of LAX. In the absence of a regional vision, there is a
breakdown in the system." Woo also went on to discuss other key
issues such as transportation.
Alarc�n, one of the few that already has filed papers to run
for Los Angeles mayor in 2005, said that he's running because he
believes he can bring together all of the different constituencies
in Los Angeles. "The City has missed the opportunity to engage all
of the people in the community. Politicians alone can't make the
community better. People have to make the community better."
Lozano, who told the crowd "all of us have a responsibility to help
people come together," also was the first of the panel to discuss
the 2001 mayoral race in terms of race. "The 2001 mayoral race had
racist undertones," she stated. "It happened. Our obligation is to
ensure it is not repeated in 2005."
The closing roundtable included L.A. city council member and former
mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa, president of the Drum Major
Institute and former Bronx Borough President Fernando Ferrer,
California Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamante, and Center for the Study
of Los Angeles director Fernando Guerra as moderator.
Ferrer opened the panel by comparing the similarities and
differences between his unsuccessful bid for mayor of New York City
with Villaraigosa's run in Los Angeles.
"People do dumb things when they feel threatened," said Ferrer.
"They do pull out the race card and the fear card. In my case, they
played the fear card. The point of this conference is to examine
the viability of multiracial, multiethnic coalitions, and to
underscore the real need to create these coalitions in order to
have successful cities in the future."
Villaraigosa opened his remarks by commenting, "First let me say
that I don't believe I lost [the mayoral bid] because I was Latino.
I'm not here to argue that race was the overriding issue in my
case. I do believe, however, that right from the beginning that I
was singled out as the Latino candidate for mayor. Steve Soberoff
was the first Jewish candidate - why wasn't that put that in front
of his name? Kathleen Connell was the first woman - why didn't they
put that in front of her name? What putting "Latino" in front of my
name did was say that I'm different."
Bustamante discussed the California recall, saying, "The recall was
not reality."
The conference - which sought to facilitate a dialogue between
elected, activist, academic and media leaders on urban issues -
also identified key lessons drawn from the recent political
histories of Los Angeles, New York, and other large cities.
Sponsored by The Center for The Study of Los Angeles at LMU, The
Drum Major Institute, and Dr. John Mollenkopf of the Center for
Urban Research at the City University of New York, the Los Angeles
conference mirrored a successful New York conference exploring the
same urban issues. Both conferences were based on a study
commissioned by the Drum Major Institute entitled "People and
Politics in America's Big Cities: Challenges to Urban Democracy,"
written by Mollenkopf in conjunction with John Logan of the Lewis
Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research.
"Cities that did not recognize and ameliorate the widening gap
created by demographic change in the 1960s and 1970s paid a serious
price. The urban riots of the 1960s and the subsequent racial
polarization, white flight, and economic disinvestment took a heavy
toll on cities like Detroit and Newark. Cities that collaborated to
bridge this political gulf fared far better," said study author
Mollenkopf. "Today's conference has been a critical investigation
into the impact of the profound demographic transformation under
way in New York and Los Angeles."
For a complete list of the day's events, a copy of the study, or
other information, contact The Center for The Study of Los Angeles
at Loyola Marymount University at 310.338.4565. Media may contact
LMU's media relations office at 310.338.2389.
###
|